(January 20, 2015, 6:02 PM EST)

-" The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday cast aside the Federal Circuit's long-standing rule that all district court claim construction rulings must be reviewed anew on appeal. Here, attorneys tell Law360 why the decision in Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz is significant. "

There will be no appeal process  for the civil claims construction results e.Digital vs. Google.....with regard to "The battle of experts over claim term meanings"

IMVHO...The IPR process seems to have over whelmed the civil procedures.....as a review process with its own set of circumstances regarding claims construction. The process carries a  a definitive out come of patents being good or no good.....   

sman, the question is .....what are your thoughts on the experts presentations during the IPR  process?

IMVHO e.Digitals experts presented a very clear picture.

With that,  we have no idea what forced the eventual  settlement...the civil claims construction results favoring e.Digital , or the depositions of IPR experts that, IMVHO, favored e.Digital?

e.Digital had positive issues in its corner. As nasty as all things seem to be that is why no one can simply walk away.

doni