Noront Resources

High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire" NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)

Home Videos Research Press Release Q&A Discussion

Threads Posts

Baosteel?

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

over 12 years ago

in response to Fossil's message

Two points.

Because the period to acquire up to 19.9% expires at the same time as the warrants Baosteel is limited to a maximum of 19.9% until May 2013. The impact of the warrants would be on NOTs treasury.

Its not clear who the standstill agreement is binding on. My grammatical read of the sentence is that they Baosteel has been granted a standstill agreement which would imply that it limits what NOT can do. That would make sense if Baosteel wanted to see its dollars put in the ground before they had to decide about a follow on investment. Not already ties up Baosteel to a maximum of 19.9% until May 2013.

Lots of guessing here.