e.Digital

Flash-R™ patent portfolio e.Digital's Flash-R™ patent portfolio contains fundamental technology essential to the utilization of flash memory in today's large and growing portable electronic products market.

Home Videos Research Press Release Q&A Discussion

Threads Posts

EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11 - good news SS thanks !

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11 TIME TO...

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11 TIME TO...

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11...COMBA...

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

minister

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: minister/ Sometimes Gil

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

Re: minister/ Sometimes Gil

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

swan

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

Re: gocougs/swan, here's the box.net link

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

gocougs

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

about 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

almost 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

almost 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

almost 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

almost 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

almost 14 years ago

Re: EDIG v. CO 19 Markman Date 1/28/11

e.Digital

almost 14 years ago

Re: swan

e.Digital

about 14 years ago

in response to gocougs's message

Gil explained it correctly. The defendants attempted to abreviate the discovery process by pushing the court to schedule the Markman Hearing prior to "full blown" discovery. The court ruled that full discovery will proceed 21 days after the 7/30 hearing.

DM PREVAILED on this issue. Make no mistake, the defendants did not want full discovery, but because of the the ruling in our favor, must comply with full discovery.