Noront Resources

High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire" NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
Yes but
over 16 years ago
3
Re: Yes but
over 16 years ago
1
Re: Yes but
over 16 years ago
2
Re: Yes but
over 16 years ago
11
Re: Yes but
over 16 years ago
5
Re: Yes but
over 16 years ago
4
Re: Yes but
over 16 years ago
12
in response to lor's message
Are you saying they have NOT as a sell based strictly on TA ? That would be absolutely reckless if they are saying "sell if you own it, do not plan on buying it back, and by the way short it for the same reason because it will never go up". It  is plausible they could justify saying " Hold but do not add because there is some probability of a pullback" . But to repeat, it would be absolutely reckless to recommend selling this stock on TA when the FUNDAMENTALS can push it quickly to the stratosphere without notice. TA assumes that FUNDAMENTAL changes and nr's follow such an even and predictable flow they will not or cannot cause major abrupt changes in price. That does not describe NOT, and that says to me  " They have not got a penny in the game".( like many of the shorting hedge fund operators.) TA sounds great to the uninitiated but it is the wrong tool for NOT . Straight spec, great value upside , one NR can instantly make irrelevant all that has gone before. If you do not think its a good story, of course, sell it. but that is not TA
Please login to post a reply
rapidrob
City
temiskaming shores
Rank
President
Activity Points
13659
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
01/01/2008
Social Links
Private Message
Noront Resources
Symbol
NOT
Exchange
TSX-V
Shares
326,029,076 As of Jan 17, 2017
Industry
Metals & Minerals
Create a Post