It seems the new poster is not only poorly versed but also quite confused as to what he is talking about. I do not feel this alias is a Steve by-product (more like Bushboy) although it doesn't matter one way or the other.
Maybe a timeline on some of the events may clear his cob webs a bit.
January 10, 2012 a news release was issued announcing the Tesorso drill results.
http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/st-elias-mines-ltd-2011-diamond-drilling-gold-results-tesoro-gold-project-in-peru-tsx-venture-sli-1605365.htm
January 11, 2012 a news release was issued announcing the resignation of Duncan Bain and Allan St. James.
http://www.stockwatch.com/News/Item.aspx?bid=Z-C%3ASLI-1917621&symbol=SLI®ion=C
June 12, 2012 a news release was issued announcing the termination of Murry Braucht.
http://www.stockwatch.com/News/Item.aspx?bid=Z-C:SLI-1968997&symbol=SLI®ion=C
Now why would Bain "resign" immediately following the drill results? Could it have been to create a public illusion that the company "geologist" was disgraced? Of course it couldn't have been, as he wasn't the geologist working in Peru, and he was asked to resign by the CEO.
And what if Murry were to have resigned that day along with his fellow directors? If he did put out his resignation, could it be possible that the CEO adamantly refused to accept it? It doesn't make much sense for his resignation to be denied if he was only to be terminated with cause 5 months later? Have the shareholders been notified what the official cause of his termination was? Who would take the heat if he were already gone? Hmmm.....JMO
