The entire doc is doc 64. Here it is:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA E.DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. IVIDEON LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 15-cv-00691-JST ORDER VACATING HEARING Re: ECF No. 54 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Vacate Entry of Default. ECF No. 54. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for August 18, 2016, is hereby vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 8, 2016 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge
Per Plank---ese--- opinion...
the Defendant's Motion (Ivideon dba as Oco Camera) to vacate (edig's) Default Judgment ( the clerk had previously entered a technical default in the record, Plank believes, but no formal Default Judgment was entered as a hearing on unliquidated damages would probably be required....must come down and give testimony on evidence for court to determine how much the damages are to include in the Judgment)....Defendants are trying to rid the record of the "clerk's default" for failure to answer.....as of now the Judge has cancelled oral argument on the Defendant's Motion and he has taken their Motion under advisement, ...and yes Plank expects him to rule soon...or we see a settlement very soon...Plank would expect settlement as Oco appears to be on a huge growth path...and now....they care.
*****
astericks!! serious! ****
