e.Digital

Flash-R™ patent portfolio e.Digital's Flash-R™ patent portfolio contains fundamental technology essential to the utilization of flash memory in today's large and growing portable electronic products market.

almost 11 years ago

Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

thanks sman998 and doni! now the real show can begin! rock and roll it is

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: thanks sman998 and doni! now the real show can begin! rock and roll it is

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

doni, yes I understand your premise..EVEN MORE EXCITING! praying for our

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: thanks sman998 and doni! now the real show can begin!

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: IAM, AMEN..apple needs to "own it" for oh, say $7 a share for EDIG :)) eom

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

Re: Pacer-EDIG v.Apple- JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED PARTIAL JUDGMENT

e.Digital

almost 11 years ago

in response to sman998's message

"The interesting part , both Apple & e.DIGITAL agree Complaint asserting certain claims against Apple for patent infringement on Complaint alleged that certain Apple products (the“Accused Products”)."

sman.. with that...these guys have been down this road in the Colorado case and they know the score.

GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP
KEVIN J. O’SHEA; JAMES J. DECARLO

They settled: DECARLO:VTECH Electronics North America, LLC; O’SHEA: Canon USA, Inc.; Canon, Inc.

"1. In light of the Collateral Estoppel Order, the Parties request that the Court enter, and/or incorporate into any final judgment of the Court in this matter, the Stipulated Partial Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit “A”."

As I read that, it appears they are working toward settling 737 and 170, if the court does not judge on anything in regard to them.. the end....nothing to incorporate Exhibit “A” to.

No appeal will happen....if Apple settles no further litigation regarding 774...

doni