A good morrow to you to Dave ,
I suppose that the point I was trying to get across, and failed, was that given that Pelligrino applies as scientific method to its algorithms as it can devise, the range within Pelligrino must have narrowed towards the upper end say a tad over 4 billion dollars or towards $20 per share.
I agree the supposition is wide open but given the not inconsiderable costs of Pelligrono there must be some merit in staying within its bounds and thus we have a means of evaluating POET With a degree of accuracy better than the wet finger in the air approach.
With regards
Robert, the sailor of sula.
