YouTube states the file was removed by its owner. CIC would have done this. I was told POET had not vetted the video by CIC . One could understand that there could be reasons for the company to request its removal once they realised it Was being circulated.
There clearly a procedural error in not applying restrictions but film editors make mistakes to get their materiel out. Once its out there its out there. So be it.
Its no bad thing in my book to see how the management work. I am for openess and anything said here is opinion, no shareholder would want to deliberately damage the company they invested in.
