Noront Resources

High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire" NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
NOT 09-50 Hole
about 15 years ago
12
18
16
17
in response to MaCloud's message

And if they hit massive sulphides in NOT-09-50, they'll have to step out again to try to find a hole that *doesn't* hit mineralization for a clear BHEM survey. What a terrible problem! :-) Trying to drill and drill and *not* find nickel- the irony is really tickling.

So it looks to me like the BHEM *has* to be done in a vertical hole (probably to be able to just dangle the sensor and not have it get stuck)? Will the standard 2" hole support BHEM, or does the equipment require a larger diameter hole? Can one of our wonderful geologists comment? The reason that I ask is that if a vertical hole is *not* required, we've probably already got some non-hit candidates. And the only time I've seen down-hole geophyisical survey instrumentation was back in 1983 in Calgary at a geophysics conference. They were more like 6" in diameter back then.

Please login to post a reply
dvdgray
City
El Cerrito, CA
Rank
Treasurer
Activity Points
3226
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
08/18/2008
Social Links
Private Message
Noront Resources
Symbol
NOT
Exchange
TSX-V
Shares
326,029,076 As of Jan 17, 2017
Industry
Metals & Minerals
Create a Post