Noront Resources

High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire" NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
Proxy Info.
almost 16 years ago
1

4. DISTINCTION BETWEEN SOLICITED AND UNSOLICITED PROXIES

The right of a shareholder to appoint a proxy (the proxyholder) to attend and vote at meetings on his or her

behalf is a statutory right. It does not exist at common law and yet, subject to the statutory requirements, it

is governed by the common law of agency.

Moreover, the categories of solicited and unsolicited proxies directly affect the application of agency

principles to the proxy process. The principal policy objective of the proxy system is to ensure that, as

much as practicable, shareholders are provided with sufficiently detailed, accurate information, in the form

of the management information circular, upon which to make a reasoned decision and to be given a form

of proxy which preserves the shareholder’s freedom to support or reject the propositions advanced by

management in the circular. Solicited proxies are those obtained on request (the “solicitation”) by

management or by a dissident group. The completed proxy will usually be in the form provided by the

soliciting party. The shareholder does not give an “unsolicited proxy” in response to any solicitation. It

simply represents the shareholder’s exercise of his or her right to appoint someone to attend and vote on

his or her behalf at the meeting. The corporation cannot purport to prescribe the form to be used by a

shareholder wishing to appoint a proxy, although it may require proxies to be deposited by a prescribed

time, not less than 48 hours prior to the meeting.

20

Among the many important reforms to the Canadian proxy system recommended by the Kimber Report

21

was the recommendation that solicited proxies provide shareholders with a choice to vote “for” or “against”

each specific proposition, the so-called “two-way proxy”. That recommendation is today reflected in

Canadian corporate proxy rules such that any person soliciting proxies, be it on behalf of management or

a dissident group, is required to provide shareholders with the alternative to support or reject the

proposition(s) for which the proxies are being solicited.

A glaring example of a management solicitation in which that choice was effectively denied is found in

Goldhar v. D’Aragon Mines Ltd

.22

The management-solicited proxy in that case allowed shareholders to

vote for or against a resolution calling for the removal of the incumbent board of directors. The proxy also

contained the proviso that any proxies cast in favour of the proposal to remove the incumbent directors

would be denied the opportunity to be counted on the subsequent vote for new directors, in which the

incumbent directors would be standing for re-election! The Court held the proxy form to be void for failure

to provide shareholders with the right to exercise their choice in connection with “the transaction of

business stated in the requisition”.

23

20

BCCA, supra note 3, s. 151(9); CBCA, supra

note 4, s. 148(5).

21

Ontario, The Report of the Attorney General’s Committee on Securities Legislation in Ontario

(Ontario: Queen's Printer, 1965)

[Kimber Report].

22

(1977), 15 O.R. (2d) 80, 75 D.L.R. (3d) 16 (H.C.J.) [Goldhar

cited to D.L.R.].

23







Ibid

. at 18-19.

Please login to post a reply
tutank
City
Waterloo, Ontario
Rank
Treasurer
Activity Points
1372
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
09/07/2007
Social Links
Private Message
Noront Resources
Symbol
NOT
Exchange
TSX-V
Shares
326,029,076 As of Jan 17, 2017
Industry
Metals & Minerals
Create a Post