The best part of getting peoples opinions is seeing things from all angles, Im just curious to see what other peoples thoughts are is all.
Well I've poste this many times before , here are what some reputable analyst are saying:
LAWRENCE ROULSTON 2011
A back-in would be confirmation of the value of the project with Copper Fox holding 25% of a large project funded by a major.
If Teck does not back in, Copper Fox would effectively hold 100% of a billion tonne copper-gold deposit. They would have little difficulty in finding another partner.
Most significantly, the emerging Paramount zone and the other targets stand to add a significant high grade component to the project and thereby add substantial value to the project.
That value might be realized in the near term if a major metals company wanted a stake in a big development project in a very favorable jurisdiction.
JAY TAYLOR
''The sheer size of Schaft Creek is the factor behind another point made by some analysts in Canada. In short, they believe its size makes it an irresistible, strategic asset that China or some other Asian economy must secure. Thus, they expect that, if Teck backs out of the project, we will see a sovereign wealth fund or some other national entity step in to fund its development.
