snezzer's Profile

God. wife. kids. what else is there? oh ya.... money.

snezzer's Posts

Re: AGM

Hmmmmm.... Exciting times here.

almost 9 years ago
AGM

I look forward to hearing all about the AGM today. Might be nice to hear about why drill results are taking so long. I MIGHT consider jumping back in but the only information I have is from a handful of investors who are convinced (somehow) that CCB will have the best graphite on the planet.


So, again... I'm sure many investors attended this meeting. I can't wait to hear the reports.


Thanks in advance.


~snezzer

almost 9 years ago
Re: ZEN's financial state...Sneezer

Yup, I did! And that's fantastic!! I'm just low on trust these days. Although I don't have any reason NOT to trust Aubrey or the ZEN team. They don't grease Bay St bankers palms, they don't lavish themselves with heavy options, and they don't pump. This is the opposite of that.


I'm just.... a little.... gunshy is all.

over 9 years ago
Re: ZEN's financial state...

Good points, G. And you're right... My ability to trust a CEO is low. I will admit that. :)

over 9 years ago
Re: ZEN's financial state...

I'm not getting a reply via pm so I'll ask here.


Hey jysk!


I was perusing the Ag posts just now and came across your reply to dvsk14 where you said:


"Look it I called the company and the will have no issue with financing, in fact they are being approached, not the other way around."


The financing going forward is my number one concern as well. Until I read in the FP article that Aubrey was quoted as saying they're all good on that front. But your post was before that article came out and I'm curious who you spoke to at the office.


Did I understand your post correctly? You called the office and were told that they will have no issue and that they are being approached? someone told you that? Or were you just assuming that?


Thanks,


~snezzer

over 9 years ago
Re: the PEA - time to call a spade, a spade...

I agree with Larry. It's obvious to me that the higher cost per ton used in the PEA caused a change in the economic cut-off grade. (there were probably other factors as well) Which is why some of the indicated resources were not included.


I am disappointed in the overall PEA. but it's still economical. And the costs were higher than SOME people's expectations. But $2000 per ton is still SUPER and creates a fantastic profit margin, IMO.


Bottom line for me... if one takes the entire PEA as fact... it's still good, and it's still worth mining. (Not as good as I had hoped for sure, but it's not bad.)


I see people on BOTH sides of the fence (the overly optimistic and the overly negative) picking and choosing aspects of the PEA that they disagree with. I think that's silly.


But it is my opinion that the numbers will get better overall as we move forward. Which is why I am still invested here.


I honestly care LESS THAN ZERO about what the perma-naysayers have to say about the PEA. congrats to chief for being right about everything he's ever said. ever. and ever. big pat on the back from me. for real. way to go.


but when i consider "bashing"... (those who don't own ZEN but constantly slag it, and those who don't own CCB but constantly slag it)... it is for losers. I say: Pick your horse(s), put your big boy/girl pants on... and see what happens. No need to be hammering down other people's investments. It just makes you look unethical and immoral. I cannot see ANY other reason for it.


~snezzer

over 9 years ago
snezzer
City
Surrey
Rank
President
Activity Points
1744
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
12/06/2009
Social Links
Private Message