...... were any of you shareholders asked why you didn't sell your position in SLI after the initial drill results came out, and thereafter up until the stock was recently halted?
The answer to the above question is very important and should have been asked by any investigative agency. For it is there that the foundation and starting point of the whole argument was initiated.
The simple reason why we didn't sell was because the historic data creates an inpenetrable depiction of the value of the properties. Because of this, any investigative agency should have focused their attention on getting to the root of the problem by examining the historic geological data, then comparing it with the ridiculous disconnected drill and trench results. Upon any investigative unit initiating an investigation, to start at the begining of the problem, is logic and only common sense. This investigation into the geology could have been quickly done and the shareholders saved from much harm and we would not have been forced into a situation of duress. A quick investigation would have shown that management was concealing information or was totally deceptive, drawing a very early conclusion by investigators that could have been conveyed to shareholders. Where this did not happen, it only strengthens the belief by shareholders that these properties are huge and caused the shareholders to hold onto their stock and fight for what was trying to be stole from them, there is no other argument nor reasoning.
When a geological assessment could have been constructed by investigators in most likely as little as days or a month at the most, the results could have been given to or publicly published to investors within two months of an investigation being opened. This would have allowed investors the opportunity to sell if it was found out this was a scam, or, it would have removed management under the course of the law, by fraud. Any way you look at it, this would have been resolved in as little as 2 months, not the 3 years we are at currently and continuing.
Where no geological assessment has been released by any authority, it enforces that all the historic data is correct and its current interpretation of the historic data by the SLI shareholders, as being correct. This in turn shows the involvement by the authorities in this cover up and their aiding and abetting in stall tactics to deprive shareholders of their ownership to their investment which has the assets of the company, the properties, as the main deprivation. The investegators have obviously allowed the SLI shareholders to be deprived by exploitive means of the Cueva Blanca, and allow the exploitation to continue through the disposition of the assets by a deceitful management. It takes no competent investigator here to see what is actually happening, only common sense.
If we wish to put an initial solid value on the harm done to investors by the investigative units, leaving the values of the properties out of the equation, leaving out the suffering of 3 years and the monetary restraints entailed as a result of this negligence, you must begin at the value of the company at its high, which was close to $300 million dollars. This is what is owed to investors as a starting point.
Please shareholders, answer my initial question in this post for information purposes for all.
Thank You
Rick Jewers
