"then in August the settlement and license agreement information with Google was on a Pacer, then removed, and Edig never PR'd the settlement."
It was never on PACER, it was sited on the PTAB filings as an exhibit.
When the Civil case concluded, with a supposed settlement of some sort, the PTAB required a copy of the civil case settlement agreement. Google, apparently, filed a copy to the PTAB noted in its updated exhibit list in concluding the IPR.
Shortly after filing doc exhibit 1025 to the PTAB....like a few days, the IPR concluded where the PTAB case filings closed to public view.
Doc exhibit 1025 simply had the heading:
"1025 Confidential Settlement and License Agreement Between e.Digital Corporation and Google, Inc., as filed in e.Digital Corporation v. Dropcam, Inc., N.D. Cal. Case No. 3:14-cv-04922. (Board and Parties Only)"
No one has read it except for the parties, PTAB board, and the civil case judge.
For the Civil case conclusion It was never required to be filed on PACER.
From there it has been a complete mystery.
e.Digital did not start the mystery...Google did, with its updated exhibit list.
e.Digitals IPR exhibit list never revealed it.
With that, it's hard to tell what e.Digital has in mind.... Where shortly after a development platform is announced and then come the new board members.
doni
