e.Digital

Flash-R™ patent portfolio e.Digital's Flash-R™ patent portfolio contains fundamental technology essential to the utilization of flash memory in today's large and growing portable electronic products market.

Home Videos Research Press Release Q&A Discussion

Threads Posts

Scott Nettles testimony (2)

e.Digital

almost 8 years ago

in response to sman998's message

Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474 and -01475 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD GOOGLE INC., NEST LABS, INC., and DROPCAM, INC., Petitioners, v. e.DIGITAL CORPORATION Patent Owner. Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474, and -01475 DECLARATION OF SCOTT M. NETTLES IN SUPPORT OF PATENT OWNER RESPONSE TO PETITION PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.120

Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474 and -01475 1 I, Scott M. Nettles, declare as follows: I. Introduction 1. I have been retained on behalf of e.Digital Corporation (the “Patent Owner” or “Owner”) for the above-captioned Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings. 2. I am being compensated for my time in connection with this IPR at my standard hourly consulting rate. I have no personal or financial stake or interest in the outcome of the present proceeding. 3. This declaration is submitted in support of Patent Owner’s responses in each of the above-captioned proceedings. I understand that U.S. Patent No. 8,311,522 B1 (“the ’522 patent”) is the parent of each of the other disputed patents and that the other disputed patents are direct continuations of the ’522 patent. I further understand that, aside from information covering the relationship of the continuation patents to the ’522 patent, the respective specifications of each of the disputed patents are essentially identical. For the sake of efficiency, I cite only to the ’522 patent in this declaration, but understand that the same information is contained in each of the disputed patents. II. List of Documents Considered 4. In preparing this Declaration, I have reviewed and am familiar with, among other things, the following materials: e.Digital Corporation Exhibit 2015 - Page 3 Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474 and -01475 2 • The ’522 patent; • U.S. Patent No. 8,306,514 B1 (“the ’514 patent”); • U.S. Patent No. 8,311,523 B1 (“the ’523 patent”); • U.S. Patent No. 8,311,524 B1 (“the ’524 patent”); • U.S. Patent No. 8,315,618 B1 (“the ’618 patent”); • U.S. Patent No. 8,315,619 B1 (“the ’619 patent”); • International Patent Publication No. WO 2009/043020 A2 to Miluzzo et al., entitled “System And Method For Injecting Sensed Presence Into Social Networking Applications” (“Miluzzo”) (Ex. GOOG 1007); • U.S. Patent Publication No. US2006/0004680 A1 to Robarts, et al., entitled “Contextual Responses Based On Automated Learning Techniques” (“Robarts”) (Ex. GOOG 1008); • The subject Petition for Inter Partes Review of the ’522 Patent (Paper No. 1); • Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response to the subject Petition for Inter Partes Review of the ’522 Patent (Paper No. 8); • The Decision Instituting Inter Partes Review of the ’522 Patent (Paper No. 11); • The Declaration of David H. Williams filed in support of the e.Digital Corporation Exhibit 2015 - Page 4

Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474 and -01475 3 subject Petition for Inter Partes Review of the ’522 patent (Ex. GOOG 1003); • The Deposition/Cross-Examination of David H. Williams taken on March 15, 2016 in this matter (relevant portions of which are submitted as Ex. 2013); • The claim construction order entered in e.Digital v. Dropcam, Case No. 3:14-cv-04922-JST (Ex. 2003); • “Towards a Better Understanding of Context and ContextAwareness”, Anind K. Dey and Gregory D. Abowd, HUC ’99 Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer-Verlag London, UK (1999) (Ex. 2019); • “Learning to Detect User Activity and Availability from a Variety of Sensor Data,” Martin Mühlenbrock, Oliver Brdiczka, Dave Snowdon, Jean-Luc Meunier, Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM ’04) (2004) (Ex. 2018); • “A Survey of Mobile Phone Sensing,” Nicholas D. Lane, Emiliano Miluzzo, Hong Lu, Daniel Peebles, Tanzeem Choudhury, and Andrew T. Campbell, Communications e.Digital Corporation Exhibit 2015 - Page 5 Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474 and -01475 4 Magazine IEEE 48.9 (2010) (Ex. 2017); • “Multi-Sensor Context-Awareness in Mobile Devices and Smart Artifacts,” Gellersen et al., Mobile Networks and Applications v.7 n.5, p.341-351, October 2002 (“Gellersen”) (Ex. GOOG 1009); • “A Privacy Framework for Mobile Health and Home-Care Systems,” Kotz, et al., SPIMACS '09 (Nov. 13, 2009) (“Kotz”) (Ex. GOOG 1011); • Patent Publication No. US 2008/0140650 A1 to Stackpole, entitled “Dynamic Geosocial Networking,” published June 12, 2008 (Ex. GOOG 1013); • “Wearable Computing and Contextual Awareness,” T. Starner, Ph.D. thesis, MIT Media Lab., Apr. 30, 1999 (“Starner”) (Ex. GOOG 1015); • “Designing for privacy in ubiquitous computing environments,” V. Bellotti and A. Sellen, In Proc. European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Milano, Italy, September 1993 (“Bellotti”) (Ex. GOOG 1016); and • “On Protecting Private Information in Social Networks: A Proposal,” Luo, et al., Data Engineering, ICDE ’09. IEEE 25th e.Digital Corporation Exhibit 2015 - Page 6 Case Nos. IPR2015-01470, -01471, -01472, -01473, -01474 and -0147