e.Digital

IN ONE OF THE FAR AWAY SHAREHOLDERS MEETING, WHEN ROBERT PUTNAM WAS AVAILABLE AT MOST ANYTIME AND VERY TALKATIVE, I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH HIM ABOUT VOTING FOR OFFICERS....ETC...ETC.....THE UPSHOT OF THE CONVERSATION WAS HIS INFORMING ME IT REALLY MADE NO DIFFERENCE WHO, AND OR WHAT, THE SHAREHOLDERS LIKE MYSELF AND YOU'SE GUYS DID WITH YOUR BALLOTS BECAUSE THE COMPANY CONTROLLED FAR MORE SHARES AND THE MEETING WAS BEING HELD WAS STRICTLY FOR THE LEGAL PROCESS AND REQUIREMENTS OF HOLDING A SHAREHOLDERS MEETING. IF YOU REALLY THINK ABOUT IT, WE, AND SHAREHOLDERS LIKE US, MIGHT OWN (CONTROL)

WHAT??? 30, OR 50, MAYBE EVEN 100 MILLION SHARES, THOUGH 100 MILLION MIGHT BE REALLY OVERREACHING. THERE ARE ABOUT 280 OR SO SHARES OUT THERE SOMEWHERE THAT DON'T HAVE OUR NAMES ON THEM......I INVITE YOU TO DO THE MATH AND FIGURE OUT WHERE THE REAL VOTING POWER IS.........FRANK