see, Edig's Opening Claim construction brief in Dropcam
gee just a "few" alleged infringements ;)
bold by plank....between astericks is actually a footnote, (just the way it copied, so Plank separated by astericks....seriously, Plank is using astericks????)
Against Defendant Dropcam, Inc. (“Dropcam” or “Defendant”), e.Digital asserts claims 1, 3, 6, 17, 21, 24 and 25 of the ’522 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 32 and 33 of the ’514 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 19, 21, 23, 25 and 26 of the ’523 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 of the ’524 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 15, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, and 25 of the ’618 patent; and claims 1, 3, 4, 8, 19, 21, 23, 29, 30 and 32 of the ’619 patent. The accused products include, but are not limited to Defendant’s Dropcam and Dropcam Pro wireless camera systems, which include, without limitation, Defendant’s server/cloud services, and subscription services for remote
*******1 The ’522 patent is hereafter occasionally referred to as the “parent ’522 patent.” The ’514, ’523, ’524, ’618, and ’619 patents are hereinafter occasionally referred to collectively as the “Continuation Patents.” 2 Because the specification of each of the Asserted Patents contains word-for-word identical disclosures, for the sake of brevity and efficiency, Plaintiff cites specifically herein to the specification of the parent ’522 patent. However, Plaintiff represents and hereby notifies the Court and Defendant that Plaintiff relies on the exact same disclosures contained in the Continuation Patents, which, again, contain exactly the same disclosures as the specification of the ’522 patent. Case3:14-cv-04922-JST Document50 Filed06/10/15 Page4 of 28 PLAINTIFF’S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF Case No. 14-cv-04922-JST -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HANDAL & ASSOCIATES 750 B STREET SUITE 2510 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 TEL: 619.544.6400 FAX: 619.696.0323********
monitoring and communication
