e.Digital

Flash-R™ patent portfolio e.Digital's Flash-R™ patent portfolio contains fundamental technology essential to the utilization of flash memory in today's large and growing portable electronic products market.
Home Videos Research Press Release Q&A Discussion
Discussion Parent
Threads Posts
There was no Apple "deal" !
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
7
Re: There was no Apple "deal" !
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
7
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And...
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
3
Re: There was no Apple "deal" !
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
4
Re: There was no Apple "deal" !
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
3
Re: There was no Apple "deal" !
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
2
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And...
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
4
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And...
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
1
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
2
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
1
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
0
Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Patriot Memory - Another Counsel appearance
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
18
Re: Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Intel
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
7
Re: Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Patriot Memory - Another Counsel appearance
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
3
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
1
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
2
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
0
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
1
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
1
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
1
Re: There was no Apple "deal" ! And... Yup
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
0
Pacer : e.DIGITAL v. Intel
e.Digital
over 10 years ago
18
in response to Giants's message
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
E.DIGITAL CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-cv-2905-H-BGS
ORDER SUBMITTING
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S
FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
[Doc. No. 18]
vs.
INTEL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
On March 19, 2014, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation filed its First Amended
Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendant Intel Corporation. (Doc. No. 13.) On March
28, 2014, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s FAC. (Doc. No. 18.) Plaintiff
filed its opposition on April 14, 2014. (Doc. No. 22.) Defendant filed its reply on
April 21, 2014. (Doc. No. 23.) A hearing on Defendant’s motion is currently
scheduled for April 28, 2014 at 10:30 a.m.
The Court, pursuant to its discretion under Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), concludes
that resolution of the motion does not require oral argument. The Court therefore
vacates the scheduled hearing and submits the motion on the parties’ papers
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 22, 2014
______________________________
MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Please login to post a reply
sman998
City
ORANGE , CALIFORNIA
Rank
President
Activity Points
93979
Rating
Your Rating
Please Log In to Vote
Date Joined
12/02/2006
Social Links
Private Message
e.Digital
Stock Quotes
Symbol
EDIG
Exchange
OTCBB
Shares
293,680,000 approx 2016
Industry
Technology & Medical
Website
edigital.com/
Create a Post
Follow Hub
Disclaimer