e.Digital

Flash-R™ patent portfolio e.Digital's Flash-R™ patent portfolio contains fundamental technology essential to the utilization of flash memory in today's large and growing portable electronic products market.
in response to doni's message

ANTON HANDAL (Bar No. 113812)

anh@handal-law.com

PAMELA C. CHALK (Bar No. 216411)

pchalk@handal-law.com

GABRIEL HEDRICK (Bar No. 220649)

ghedrick@handal-law.com

HANDAL & Associate

1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1321

San Diego, California 92101

Tel: 619.544.6400

Fax: 619.696.0323

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, e.Digital Corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

e.Digital Corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

Woodman Labs, Inc. dba GoPro,

Defendant.

And Related Counterclaims.

Case No. 3:12-cv-02899-DMS(WVG)

E.DIGITAL CORPORATION’S

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL

NOTICE AND NOTICE OF

OBJECTIONS TO

“DEFENDANT’S NOTICE

JOINING REPLY BRIEF IN

SUPPORT OF MOTION TO

AMEND THE STIPULATED

PARTIAL JUDGMENT

AND RESPONSE TO OBJECTION

TO DECLARATION OF BRYAN

A. KOHM”

(SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF

OPPOSITION TO “APPLE’S

NOTICE OF MOTION AND

MOTION TO AMEND THE

STIPULATED PARTIAL

JUDGMENT TO CERTIFY THE

COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL

ORDER FOR IMMEDIATE

APPEAL” AND GOPRO’S

JOINDER THEREIN)

Date: December 20, 2013

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Ctrm: 13A (Annex)

Judge: Hon. Judge Dana M. Sabraw

TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA:

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant e.Digital Corporation (“Plaintiff” or

“e.Digital”), by and through its attorney, hereby respectfully requests the Court to

take judicial notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 and/or all other

applicable provisions of law of the following facts:

1) On December 6, 2013, Defendant Apple Inc. filed the following reply

documents (collectively referred to herein as the “Apple Reply”) in support of its

motion to amend in the case

e.Digital Corporation v. Apple Inc.

, Case No. 3:13-cv-

00785-DMS-WVG (“Apple matter”):

a)

“Defendants’ Reply In Support Of Motion To Amend The

Stipulated Partial Judgment To Certify The Collateral Estoppel

Order

” (Dkt #66);

b) “

Declaration Of Kevin J. O’Shea In Support Of Reply In

Support Of Defendants’ Reply In Support Of Motion To Amend

The Stipulated Partial Judgments To Certify The Collateral

Estoppel Order For Immediate Appeal,

(Dkt #66-1);

c) Exhibit 4 to the “

Declaration Of Kevin J. O’Shea In Support Of

Reply In Support Of Defendants’ Reply In Support Of Motion

To Amend The Stipulated Partial Judgments To Certify The

Collateral Estoppel Order For Immediate Appeal

(Dkt #66-2);

and,

d) Exhibit 5 to the “

Declaration Of Kevin J. O’Shea In Support Of

Reply In Support Of Defendants’ Reply In Support Of Motion

To Amend The Stipulated Partial Judgments To Certify The

Collateral Estoppel Order For Immediate Appeal

(Dkt #66-3)

2) The Defendant and Counterclaimant in this case, Woodman Labs, Inc.

dba GoPro (“GoPro”), filed the document entitled “

Defendant’s Notice Joining

Reply Brief In Support Of Motion To Amend The Stipulated Partial Judgment

And Response To Objection To Declaration Of Bryan A. Kohm”

(“GoPro Reply”)

in this matter on or about December 6, 2013. (Dkt #76 in the GoPro matter).

3) On December 9, 2013, e.Digital filed “

Plaintiff e.Digital

Corporation's Exhibit A In Support Of Objections And Objections To Portions Of

“Defendants’ Reply In Support Of Motion To Amend The Stipulated Partial

Judgment To Certify The Collateral Estoppel Order”; Portions Of The

“Declaration Of Kevin J. O’Shea In Support Of Reply In Support Of Defendants’

Reply In Support Of Motion To Amend The Stipulated Partial Judgments To

Certify The Collateral Estoppel Order For Immediate Appeal” And

Exhibits 4-5 Attached Thereto

”, (“e.Digital’s Objections”) in the Apple matter, a

copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. (Dkt #67 in the Apple matter).

NOTICE is given that e.Digital Corporation objects to the GoPro Reply

and/or GoPro joinder in the Apple Reply for the same reasons and on the same

basis as stated in e.Digital’s Objections to the Apple Reply, which consists of the

document attached hereto as Exhibit 1.

It is respectfully requested that e.Digital’s Objections be sustained in both

the Apple matter and GoPro matter.

Respectfully submitted,

HANDAL & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/Pamela C. Chalk

Anton N. Handal

Gabriel G. Hedrick

Pamela C. Chalk

Attorneys for Plaintiff

e.Digital Corporation

Please login to post a reply
sman998
City
ORANGE , CALIFORNIA
Rank
President
Activity Points
93979
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
12/02/2006
Social Links
Private Message
e.Digital
Symbol
EDIG
Exchange
OTCBB
Shares
293,680,000 approx 2016
Industry
Technology & Medical
Website
Create a Post