e.Digital

Serendipitous--so Doni do you believe that because 108 was possibly wrongly included in the CE filing, that it could be grounds for throwing out the whole CE ruling which would open up the inclusion of the re exam results going forward which would obviously be to our advantage? And Plankton are you saying that the judge purposely included 108 so the collateral estoppel would not stand up to scrutiny in light of the re exam info and all of the information would be allowed to be heard by a jury if this thing goes to trial? I am not that bright nor am I good at reading between the lines. I like clear opinions, which I realize are just that, and then I can decide based on the source and what is said how credible the opinion is.