"This just seems to me to be the various attorneys for the companies involved having filed with the court their feelings why it either should or should not be heard by an appeals court."
IMO, more the reason to justify, if need be, as questions exist among many.
We have to know if ex-party re- exams are of any worth, and that is the heart of this matter with regard to e.Digital....as they suffered it.
If not, as recently stated on this board (and many of you may feel). Even with Handals posturing, as I see, contractually justified (through mutually agreed stipulations for partial judgements) composed with considerations for an appeals process if need be.....it leaves much to say about the the judicial system....by back peddling on the partial judgment rulings which the defendants now want modified.
The cases were individually filed (as new Fed court proceedings mandated) with that, each case should be based on its own merits and parties have the right to appeal the CE on their own merits....as a case by case resolution warrants.
doni
