Good thoughts.
I still think what JMK did was pass the hot potato, and feel certain it's coming right back in her lap after it's hotter and bigger.
Dr Pat spent a year or so of DD in preparation to attract a law firm to take this on. DM's James Sze, former QCOM Engr and others, did same for about a year then offered their deal. A committee approved the contingency agreement...all old info but it's a very important part of the equation IMO as we ponder current events.
So begining in 2006 this IP monetization effort began, fast forward past the TX 7 where a Markman was scheduled but never held, we got our wish for a Markman ala CO 19, confident by all accounts we'd prevail, then the set back. A low blow, a slap in the face, but the match is not over.
Someone tell me why 13 companies, most of which had their own IP experts and techy types, come to the conclusion the patents were valid and take the offer to settle and be done with it, to include those who did after the Markman/before ruling? How is it that JMK and her clerks have more technical expertise than collectively 13 companies? What the heck is wrong with this picture?!
Day 7 of 30 is Tues.
