DB,
I think the analogy was for those who treat their houses not as homes, but museums, with furniture coated in clear vinyl, and runners to protect their precious carpets, (all about appearances you know). So I am certain there was no intent to insult an ethnicity in that message, unless being OCD about material items qualifies as a protected class. But then again, maybe you need to clean up after your dogs....
Anyway, the point being made is that while we may be viewed as the somewhat crazed risk takers, many others are far more conservative in their approach. That works for me, they will pay $5, $10 and way up for a stock that has 1) revenue and 2) nearly immeasureable growth potential. We will need those folks along the way to keep the upward momentum going. And they will still make money.
I think 2016 will be special.
