I should have learned. Several years back a Share Holders meeting was held in Chicago. Before the meeting was officially closed. ( sounded like it was scheduled to go on at least another hour or two ) At least two board members excused themselves saying ' we have to catch our flight departure'. Not kidding. They schedule a one day meeting 2,000 miles away and have not the foresight to allot time for a full meeting. To me that was highly unproffessional and a precursor to what we have come to expect in-so-far-as how able bodied the PTSC ship was sailing. I didn't sell hoping against hope, I was wrong. The new 'virtual' SH meeting is at least our 2nd virtual meeting and it smells as bad as leaving early.

I'll probably ride this stock to zero.zero dollars just to confirm I'm stiff necked. I feel sorry for those that are much more entrenched monetarily. I watch this forum with interest ( not passion ) but I think we're riding a loser. I still would like being proved wrong but after 15 years it looks like I simply missed the boat.

I won't ever, ever buy a stock with patents held like a carrot before a donkey again.

Hee-haw

I may be overly basic with my thoughts but I recall recently seeing $ 0.0225 per chip and I can't get it out of my mind. It reminds me of the number of tabs on cans that people pull to open pop or beer. Whoever invented the pull tab got a miniscule amount per tab and he's a 1 percenter.

Please excuse my idle thoughts but every now and then I buy a lottery ticket to dream about too.

Long & strong

God Bless...

God Bless......

The last line in the recent judgement indeed gives 336 " validity". PTSC just has to find any culprits.

Excuse me if anyone has already touched on the subject.

Long & strong.

Call me sarcastic. I just thought Sept. 5th, meant Sept. 5th.