Great read, thank you for finding it - but I guess it will be too late for PTSC.

It's totally absurd to me that there's no legal possibility in the US to prevent Leckrone from further harming the MMP which he does now "successfully" for more than six years.

What a crook.

"In June 2015, our representative to the PDS management committee filed with the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (“JAMS”) a demand for arbitration pursuant to Alliacense’s non-performance under terms of the Novation Agreement. The demand seeks a declaration of the respective rights and obligations of the parties under the Novation Agreement. This matter is set for three days of arbitration currently commencing on May 17, 2016. "

Ouch, why in five months?
Every day without Alliacense fulfilling its obilgations is one day too much!

You write:

"The MMP now has a future in the USA."

My understanding is that a rejected Appeal would put the latest Claim Construction (the bad one) as benchmark for our licensing activities - and if every infringer can point to this CC and avoid paying how can we have a future in the US then?

Of course we could start another litigation hoping for a new and positive CC but given the expired patents does this make sense?

Anyway, I wrote off my money I invested in PTSC - my biggest financial mistake, let's hope it's the last one ...:-)

Does anyone know if our side is allowed to reply to the Defendants' statement before Nov. 19th?

TIA

Ron, thank you very much for your assessment - is there any guideline regarding how long the Judge can take his time to decide on this issue?

TIA