Ron is the one who asked it and you joined this board under the guise of a new name. Within a few weeks you have already established your unwavering support for the BOD, which only those who have relations with the BOD exhibit unwavering support.

GLTAL

It would be nice if PTSC shareholders could get a communication from the company explaining clearly how fast logic licenses are not being commingled with the mmp. What did shareholder's get from the settlement?

Gltal

Do you believe the only way shareholders will get any transparency into how PTSC is "really" being run is by having the BOD replaced?

Your answer to the above question is the reason you have to ask, "What emails?"

GLTAL

Could you put the "Part" posts into one email that could be sent to the SEC contacts you have and could you CC the investor list that Wolf and others have been sending emails to?

Every little bit helps.

GLTAL

I think it is time to send a certified letter to the SEC from a law firm specializing in corporate/securities law. IMO it is important to have the letter sent explaining the TPL - PTSC - Swartz triangle prior to any potential settlement with the T3, as I fear shareholders will continually be led blindly down a destitute path long after a confidential T3 settlement is completed, sporadically being fed scraps from the potentially one billion dollar plus MMP gravy train.

I am convinced the lack of information pertaining to the ComAg from the PTSC - TPL litigation where serious allegations were brought against TPL should have provided more freedom on how PTSC communicates material information to shareholders. All coverstories to excuse the lack of information to PTSC shareholders have been exhausted.

The litigated settlement is confidential. The ComAg, if amended, is confidential. The MMP attorneys have been changed at this late stage only a few months prior to the Markman Hearing where no work is completed during Thanksgiving and much of December due to vacation schedules. Shareholders were expecting substance from the settlement and we have seen nothing. All of the facts above demand shareholder action and through action shareholders might be able to influence settlement details pertaining to the T3 litigation.

Ron, I know you are busy but I would be willing to give 100 dollars to you to hire an SEC attorney to document shareholders' strong suspicions that the BOD of PTSC may have breached their fiduciary obligation to PTSC shareholders. I am assuming the total cost of the letter should be very modest as this would be a first step in shareholder action. It is an easy step in the right direction.

GLTAL

that TPL and PTSC are colluding to keep Moore out of the money? Licenses everything through the Core Flash Portfolio (CFP) and then TPL and PTSC split the revenue?

That way Leckrone makes more than his small % per the ComAg and PTSC will receive the true 50% minus expenses from the CFP. Anything is possible. Another story for those who support the BOD to latch onto to possibly prolong the inevitable.

GLTAL