Respectfully, I do not understand,as  my response to Golfyeti was telling someone that they do not have license to be an acousatory doink just because they lost money. I never disrespected him by saying that this did not work in "your timeframe" when the the company has been disgraceful at meeting any stated deadline. I do not put his loss on him (or many others who lost a lot of money). We are on the same side.

From what I have researched, I believe that you are being disrespectful to many people who in the past invested heavily in this company trusting in what they were saying and the timelines that they said would be followed. This has not worked out in "their time frame". Your comments just moved to insulting.

I guess that I have learned to never say that things can never get worse. You would really hope that we have bottomed out and that there will be an opportunity to make a few bucks, or for many, a few bucks back. If they would ever get around to formally announcing enhanced results from what they have been working on at SC, then maybe there would be some interest. No one is ever going to get excited about AZ and CXM. JMO

In this JV is it not a 50-50 representation to decide what moves the project forward?

Many of you are much better than me at assessing these things, but at what level does copper have to go for Schaft Creek development to make sense? It also has other assests like the gold content?

I was aways interested in just what was the relationship between Elmer and EE. Is EE the biggest mark in history, just a poor investor, just so rich that maybe one of these pet projects that he has may pay off for his grandkids or what? How did they meet? So many questions and no answers. Any speculation from our members here? Thanks.