Veeblue's Profile

Veeblue's Posts

Re: News release

Folks,

A complete set of excellent drill results, in clear tables not withholding key pieces of data, will trump any PR team in my books.

~Veeblue~

about 12 years ago
Re: from the 2005 tech report

I discovered the same thing today Sculpin when I was reviewing the tech report again!

Using the true projection, I'm going to revise the figure as well as add a few other details, and when it is finished I'll make the kml file available to the board for download.

Thanks again Sculpin for your acute sense of detail.

~Veeblue~

over 12 years ago
Re: Drill Hole Locations in Google Earth

I'm actually not referring to Google Earth, rather the 43-101 tech report figures.


Try to overlay the two images together and match up the geographic (UTM) coordiates you will see what I mean.

~Veeblue~


over 12 years ago
Re: Drill Hole Locations in Google Earth

Sculp,


I re-checked the diagram and the reason for the discrepancy is that the latitude and longitudes shown on the figures on page 158 and on page 250 of the 43-101 tech report appear to me to be incorrect.


Try to overlay the two images together and match up the geographic coordiates you will see what I mean.


~Veeblue~

over 12 years ago
Drill Hole Locations in Google Earth

Fellow shareholders,


Below is a picture of our latest drill hole locations depicted in Google Earth. It is based upon my own interpretation of the news St.Elias has made available to us fellow shareholders.


From their data, it appears that DDH-TE-05 to 08, shown in blue, were drilled at locations entirely away from the Zone Central anomaly. DDH-TE-04, DDH-TE-09, and DDH-TE-10, shown in purple, appear to be recommended high priority Quantec target drill holes 19, 21, & 22 respectively, and shown in green are the rest of Quantec's recommended high priority drill holes not yet tested.


~Veeblue~


Google Earth-Drill Hole Locations

over 12 years ago
Re: Havilah spin out release, St Elias Mines

It was speculated last summer on this forum that the massive IP anomalies identified by Quantec might even be larger than the what was presented in the figures released by SLI.


Some posters here suggested that if we were to hypothetically decrease the chargeability scale from >16 milliradians, presented, to say 14 or 13 milliradians it may be possible that the Zona Central and Zona Sur would connect. This would make the anomalies appear larger as there would be more contours to plot.


As we still do not know the exact drill hole locations, it would be logical to speculate that the drill holes are at a location that exhibited some chargeability whether it be at a >16milliradians level or a level of somewhat decreased chargeability (perhaps 14 milliradians).


~Veeblue~

over 12 years ago
Veeblue
City
Rank
Treasurer
Activity Points
455
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
11/08/2010
Social Links
Private Message