Wishful,

Your last two posts...subtle bash? Maybe, or maybe not?

I tend to agree with Jysk.

What you failed to point out is that even if your extended timeline was correct, ZEN share appreciation will not have to wait for production.  An investment savy person like yourself should know that there will likely be many positive share price catalysts along the way to production.

Another entirely possible senario would be for Panasonic/Tesla to attempt a buyout of ZEN to secure future supply.  I say "attempt", because if they or anyone else makes a move, all heck could break lose in a bidding war.

Happy New Year to you and all Agoracom posters.

Canseco

Wishfulthinker,

Yes, I read your post a few days ago and that is another possibility.

What isn't a possibility is "ZEN hits zero"

Tranquille, you wrote,

"Something´s wrong with ZEN.V apparently."

Have you considered the drop could be, just old fashioned manipulation by some pros.

There have been those who have tried to tell us that "something is wrong", for years now, yet the positives continue to pile up.

Most recently, ZEN was invited to display and to present at the Best Defence Conference.

Is it a coincidence that the block of 240,000 shares were plunked on the ask toward the end of that little gettogether of world military end users and contractors.

Perhaps some entity "really, really" liked what they saw and heard and are motivated to push the stock price down, prior to...?

Ask yourself, ....if you wanted to sell a block of shares, would you dump it on the ask all at once, or would you feed it out slowing as to not scare the price down?

C.

Thanks, Fluffy for taking the time at this late hour to provide such a detailed report.

C.

Actually I agree with your first paragraph. My mistake. I suggested these two were biased. I should have said their comments are agenda based......from his mouth..."revenge".

And, if you don't see their conflict, well..??

C.

Wishful, you wrote,

"Hoov and the chief have taken a shit kicking over their views on ZEN, and I don't blame them if they're a little bitter, with it sometimes coming out in their posts"

How can you say, in good conscience, that you don't blame them?

The "chief" has admitted his motive is revenge, and clearly has a huge conflict.

Hoov cleary continues to read this board, otherwise how did he know that Glorieux had posted? Why does a non-shareholder continue to read and formerly posted ad nauseam on the board of a stock he doesn't own? Can you say "revenge",..... again!

Nothing these two write can be taken as unbiased, and should be taken with several grains of salt.....or marble.

C.