I am not a lawyer. However I suggest you read up a little on the alter ego doctrine
......The goal in pursuing alter-ego as a remedy is looking through the corporate veil and
holding accountable the evil wizard who actually pulled the levers that damaged your
client........
Conclusion
The alter ego doctrine is rooted in a trial court’s discretion to reach a decision
based on what justice and fairness compels. Where an individual defendant is hiding
behind a corporate identity, the court should pierce the corporate veil and find a merger
of the personalities of the two. Where the individual party is attempting to hide his
personal assets not merely through a corporation but also through a Cook Island trust in
which he is a principal beneficiary, the court should recognize the outlandishness of the
conduct and invalidate the trust on its face. What you as the plaintiffs’ attorney must
accomplish is to convince the court that these decisions must be made in a timely
manner so as to maximize your client’s potential recovery. By consolidating these
issues into a single trial, you bypass any concerns the court may have with respect to
the one-final-judgment rule and achieve a true measure of civil justice.
http://www.sgpearl.com/pdf/article-using-alter-ego-to-your-clients-advantage.pdf
