So a poster has to be unbiased to post? Good luck with that. As long as it is civil, any idea posted can be debated, argued, or pooh-poohed by anyone else, and sometimes the result makes you go hmmmm. Often it doesn't, but you don't know that without starting.
Why does the chief have a "huge conflict"? He's not a fan of ZEN, and has stated his reasons. I'm puzzled by the unwillingness of some ZEN shareholders to listen to points presented that are adverse to their own notions. Some sports stars are real jerks, but people pay to see them. Posters may be jerks in your eyes, but they may be worth holding your nose and paying attention to at least some of what they say.
