Now in hindsight BC comments in October on SPY are interesting
<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-ansi-language:#0400;
mso-fareast-language:#0400;
mso-bidi-language:#0400;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
Bruce Campbell 10/14
Have been doing a lot of work on analytics. They have Semantic software and search engine that will basically filter out all the stuff so that they can look into the sports world, investment world, etc. It really surprises him that this is trading at its present value. It should probably be worth considerably more considering the patents that they have and their technology.
Maybe an Investment coming next?
Mike Smedley 06/1, comments on valuation
It has been difficult with so many companies that have small revenues with liaisons that they have managed to create. This one has just created a liaison with Amazon (AMZN-Q), which makes you think it should be $100. Amazon is interested in getting their parking software app. The most important thing for a company like this is, has it got the ingredients that somebody else needs, and will pay them $300 million for it when the market cap is $200 million.
Wireless Carriers need to make money on text, wonder what SPY is working on next?
