Hi. You get what I just wrote when I read your first post from today:
Jean-Thomas Bernard, professeur à l'Université Laval et spécialiste en énergie
This guy. I think he is against fossil fuel and dont care(or think) much about workers interests and what about export. Have you seen his calculations(he dont think the industy(shale) will ad much (and he's an energy expert), well, he's a professor and as such it looks like he speak against everything but "green" energy. I would think he likes solar and wind-power and geothermal maybe. How much does he really know about the oil&gas industry?
Yesterday, he wrote this:
http://lapresseaffaires.cyberpresse.ca/economie/energie-et-ressources/201010/26/01-4336088-gaz-de-schiste-loin-du-pactole-espere.php
The canadian gov. and oli&gas is planning different new things, like pipelins and maybe refineries(I dont know) and LNG facilleties/plants. You know about Apache-New Brunswik, also the Northern teritories, you know, the Dawson pipeline and a gassification place(excuse mY english. I'm also doing other things, but I read this from Rocco and have been reading about MontReal and Shell+.gov sites lately. I got a bit angry about this guy:)
Dont know how much his voice counts, but on our site we have: Natalie Normandeau and an other strong woman: the Gazmetro CEO.
Canada has this MAYOR recource, we have recession, there's a need for jobs(ok, they can make some jobs in renewable and ofcause they will, it's long-time, but for now(and years to come) they can reduce the CO2 emission buy 50 or at least 30% imediatly. The chineese and koreans want to be in on it(the shale industry). The Kittimat LNG is planned and ready to be build. The gov. talkes about export. Well, I dont know, but from what I read, it looks to me as they want to continue with the shale industry. The only thing that has to come, is a regulation on this field.
