Really, FJ?
SS is demanding evidence to support a thought or else it will have no value.
Did you read what SS posted? No evidence required. Simply a dot-connecting fantasy (fantasy meaning it is something everyone would want but has no evidence to back it up). BUT, it was very pro-POET so everything was okay.
Did you read what SG posted? Evidence (conditional to the SP) to suggest that SS's post was fantasy. IF POET was supplying Apple, THEN we should expect a rise in the SP. However, the SP is down (significantly), the "institutional investors" appear to have shorted POET rather than investing in it, there is no evidence of a fully functioning prototype to put into said fruit-car.
