Last year I went to the AGM along with Abel, Andy, Mazan, KGBInc, Maple Syrup, Snauser, Brightech, Babaoriley, Crolem (etc) and we all reported back to Agoracom without compensation. I would expect that many investors will do the same this year so what would be the advantage to fund one individual (from Europe) with the multitude of feedback and perspectives that will already be obtained? The Belgium event was unique and no known investors to our board were attending so it had some merit for funding a trip but if we are going to fund one that is geographically challenged then shouldn't we fund all?
If I can attend this year then I certainly will but I will not be requesting funding from Agoracoms members. In addition, Baba, Brightech and Snauser all live in California so the practicality of their attendance makes sense. To me It seems difficult to centre out "one" from the "many" in the case of a well attended event. Anyway, just ones opinion. GLTA
