It's not a popularity contest and it is also not a dictatorship, and just because you disagree with someone else's philosophy for investment does not make it wrong, or subject to censure.
ChartPOV has been civil, rational and respectful, it's more than I can say for you and Fj in this instance. So I'm saying the emporer has no clothes in this case.
Disagreement and conflict can be positive, if it forces us to consider different points of view and perspectives. I don't use TA regularly, but I do not have a "fire, bad!" attitude about it either. It does have its merits, at a minimum, the fact that it influences others' investment decisions is enough reason for me to understand its potential impact, and take advantage of that if I can. Leave it, please!
