closerlook,
Not following you exactly. First you slam silly TA, well, okay, I often think of it in similar fashion. But then, a couple of paragraphs later, you write this:
"In all probability, we have just "broken serve" on those who want this to remain a volatile penny stock, and I'd point, as fairly strong evidence, to two red candles (bearish harami) and a confirmed intraday Sell or Short signal, quickly followed by somebody's broker being forced to cover a significant amount at $1.64."
Isn't the above also TA?
Additionally, I'm all for volatility in this stock, without it, I don't see us marching up like we'd all like to see. Three days up, one day down, and they can be substantial percentages.
