Call me a stickler for accuracy, but when I calculate the percentages, I'd agree with most of these except the stated 72% increase in speed.
|
POET Comparison to Competing Technology
|
|
|
| |
Competing OE Interface
|
Potential OE Interface using POET
|
POET Advantage
|
|
power metrics transmit
|
10 mW/channel
|
2.5 mW/channel
|
75% energy savings
|
|
power metrics receive
|
11 mW/channel
|
3 mW/channel
|
72% energy savings
|
|
speed metrics max output
|
28Gbps/channel
|
100 Gbps/channel
|
72%increase speed
|
|
size
|
4 VLSI chips (5mm X5 mm each) combined with commercial DBF laser in package of 3" X 1" X 1"
|
single chip (5 mm X 5mm) in a standard flat package with fiber attached
|
A fraction of the size
|
|
Estimated cost
|
$200
|
$15
|
.075 the cost
|
Assuming the original data are correct, I'd calculate the percentage increase in "speed metrics max output" as being (100-28)/28*100 = a 257% increase in max output.
