I agree that it's usually a good thing to have someone around who will ask the tough questions. This guy's problem, though, is that he doesn't know how to admit when he's wrong. Not to mention his condescending attitude.
For example, he posted earlier that >5m at >4g/t are strong intervals for underground mining. He asked if anyone could "post some holes released in the past that show decent intervals of decent grade." Fantomas then posted several intervals from previous assay releases which met these requirements and which, by Twilight's own reasoning, would qualify as "strong intervals". Twilight's response to that was basically: well....whatever...still not good enough...
I'm not even saying this in defense of GNH. I have no idea whether this deposit is mineable or not. I'm just pointing out the fact that, as intelligent as he is, his arguments are often inconsistent and fundamentally flawed. At the very least one should be able to admit when they've been proven wrong.
...by the way don't you still owe someone a hundred bucks?
