I am very supportive of an open discussion and agree that there is often a knee jerk reaction to anything negative
If you wish to be a serious participant in this forum, I think you need to establish that you have a valid concern about Copper Fox being a successful project and provide verifiable information, or valid arguments that might bear on the success or failure of this project
Valid negative information is welcomed by me
I have spent years trying to find any of it I could
What you brought did not pass the smell test
Elmer has had a long career in the junior mining industry
It is an industry frought with risk and uncertainty
I believe something well above 80% of all such initiatives fail
Nobody in this industry for long bats 1000%
So what you brought was not only irrelevent to Copper Fox, it was presented in a way that suggests that you are at odds with the objectives of all the honest posters here
Unless you have specific information that Elmer has done something that may contribute to the failure of this project, it is simply bashing
To be sure the jury is still out, and there may be something to the smoke you cited
But that is not how you presented it
So my feeling is that until you provide some evidence that you are on the same side of this thing as I am, I am more inclined to believe you are simply a basher with a short position, or more likely no position at all
Prove me wrong
