Elmer has said that he has targed a 3 year Capex payback on a producing mine. I am hoping that Capex will come in at around $3.8B or less for previously stated reasons.
So a starter pit needs to pay back something in the order of $3.8B (plus financing costs) in three years. A 3 year pit at 120 ktpd production will require about 130 M tonnes of ore.
Does anyone have any ideas about the grade of a potential starter pit?
Looking at the 2008 PFS they have starter pit info in table 25.6....
PFS 2008 Starter Pit info: From the 2008 PFS, pg 246:http://www.copperfoxmetals.com/i/pdf/Updated_Amended_Technical_Report_5.20.10.pdf
Table 25.6 Summarized Measured, Ind Reserves for SC
|
|
|
ROM Diluted Grades
|
|
|
Pit
|
Description
|
ROM Ore (Mt)
|
NSR ($/t)
|
Cu (%)
|
Au (g/t)
|
Ag (g/t)
|
Mo (%)
|
Waste
|
Stripping Ratio (t/t)
|
P 611
|
South Starter
|
297.8
|
16.7
|
0.33
|
0.239
|
1.685
|
0.017
|
241.2
|
0.81
|
P 621i
|
South Incremental
|
136.1
|
14.3
|
0.266
|
0.207
|
1.509
|
0.018
|
178.6
|
1.31
|
P 631
|
North Starter
|
52.9
|
16.2
|
0.291
|
0.185
|
1.94
|
0.024
|
45.4
|
0.86
|
P 641i
|
Intermediate
|
208.1
|
14.3
|
0.277
|
0.148
|
1.674
|
0.02
|
476.1
|
2.29
|
P 651i
|
Final
|
125.9
|
18.1
|
0.305
|
0.263
|
2.275
|
0.027
|
601.9
|
4.78
|
Total
|
|
821.1
|
15.9
|
0.299
|
0.211
|
1.76
|
0.02
|
1543.2
|
1.88
|
my calculations...(may be very wrong...)
First scenario: If I adjust these 2008 starter pit grades a bit (upward) for a 130Mt pit mined over 3 years, $3.0 B can be paid off handily (over $300M in the black) in 4 yrs. --- using: 8% discount, 2011 RE metal prices and recoveries, metal selling costs, and these pumped up grades: Cu 0.40%, 0.02% Mo, 0.26 gpt Au, 1.80 gpt Ag.
My pumped up grades are not a huge stretch given our recent drill results and compared to the starter grades in the table above. I kept Moly grade down as its grade doesn't fluctuate much in the table and also our RE grade for Moly. Silver is a wild card given the legacy issues and the increases in the silver grades of recent cores.
Second Scenario: Increasing Capex to $3.8B makes a disproportionate effect on the payback. D@mn discounting! Same pit and numbers, takes us to a payback early in year 5. We will need a bigger pit with these same grades (about 170Mt) to make the same rate of daily production in the first scenario.
Keeping to the 3 yr target for payback... i adjusted grades a bit more upwards to see where the 4th yr drops away..
Third Scenaro: slip Capex down to $3.665 B, increase production to 150 ktpd (decreasing Capex, increasing production) and boost the grades again to the highest (??) ranges: Cu 0.43%, Mo 0.024$, Au 0.30 gpt (that's pretty high for SC!!), Ag 1.95 gpt. I get a mine payback in January/Feb of year 4 (who is counting months!). 165 Mt starter pit with these average grades would be required to meet this production.
These are just straw dog numbers to see how a starter pit needs to look. I think Elmer has a pretty good chance of getting to 3 or 4 years. 3 years is significantly harder to get to than 4 years.
Perhaps delaying some of the larger Capex items to a year or two into the start of production might be a strategy. I 'paid' all of the Capex in the 4 yrs leading to the mine startup with most of the spending weighted to the last 1 and 2 years before production.
Thoughts?