RE: silver
"Judge pointed out that the entire day was spent on two of the eight claim construction terms (i.e., “flash memory” and “a flash memory module"
My considerations prior to the hearing....
http://agoracom.com/ir/edigital/forums/discussion/topics/462348-i-could-be-wrong-and-sometimes-i-am/messages/1497174#message
RE: silver
"Yungwirth started out by asking if the computer Mihran showed on his earlier PowerPoint slide had RAM inside.Answered yes.Then Yungwirth, in a brilliant legal move IMO, asked if RAM was shown anywhere on his slide.Answered no.Yungwirth’s point was RAM is obviously in the computer just like it’s obviously implied in the 774 patent diagrams.Our patent doesn’t show or state it uses RAM, but as Norris testified, it’s obvious from the diagrams and all the processing that’s occurring.Score a big one for Yungwirth here IMO."
amazing...that and Woodys testimony..
Which way will the judge go?
IMO....e.Digital will never worry about future defendants taking that course of action, regarding 774, for claims construction considerations.....lol
doni
