Noront Resources

High-grade Ni-Cu-Pt-Pd-Au-Ag-Rh-Cr-V discoveries in the "Ring of Fire" NI 43-101 Update (March 2011): 11.0 Mt @ 1.78% Ni, 0.98% Cu, 0.99 gpt Pt and 3.41 gpt Pd and 0.20 gpt Au (M&I) / 9.0 Mt @ 1.10% Ni, 1.14% Cu, 1.16 gpt Pt and 3.49 gpt Pd and 0.30 gpt Au (Inf.)
Re: eagle 1
almost 16 years ago
3
Re: eagle 1
almost 16 years ago
48
30
Re: eagle 1
almost 16 years ago
12
eagle 1
almost 16 years ago
22

So we are back at Eagle 1, after all this time. I have been trying to figure out where we are now that we are back at square 1. To do this I have to bring all the facts down to my level in order that I can try to understand each of them.

When Eagle 1 was first discovered it was described as a displaced chunk of rock that had moved from it's original position by some force. That is relatively easy to understand. I picture a great rift in the earth that carries molten (lava?), and as it rises (or moves laterally), it carries chunks of existing ground with it.

My concept of Eagle 1 has always been one chunk of rock amid a (conduit) of some other material (peridotite). If that is reasonable it follows that there exists a much larger chunk of rock from which Eagle 1 came from. To take this one step further it follows that the greatest gain could come from finding the source of Eagle1, as a chunk of 7% nickel probably came from a much bigger chunk of the same material. Could it be possible that we have been wasting a whole year and that the source of Eagle 1 is merely 70 m below it.

I realize that this is a over simplification of things, but wouldn't it be nice. Certainly we deserve it.

Regards

K

Please login to post a reply
khareema
City
Chase B.C.
Rank
President
Activity Points
21476
Rating
Your Rating
Date Joined
10/24/2006
Social Links
Private Message
Noront Resources
Symbol
NOT
Exchange
TSX-V
Shares
326,029,076 As of Jan 17, 2017
Industry
Metals & Minerals
Create a Post